|
CRAVER'S COMMENTS October 2005 |
|||||||||||
IN THIS ISSUE· DEFINING “THE PUBLIC GOOD” · LOOK WHO’S RUNNING · TIDBITS
FUTURE ISSUESEVERY COUPLE OF MONTHS OR SO. EMAIL YOUR COMMENTS TO: TONY.CRAVER@VERIZON.NET ALSO, USE MY WEB SITE TO LOOK FOR HOUSES: TONYCRAVER.COM
THINGS TO BE PROUD OF IT APPEARS TO BE DUKE’S TURN THIS YEAR IN BASKETBALL. AFTER WATCHING UNC WIN THE TITLE LAST YEAR, DUKE OPENS THE YEAR RANKED NUMBER ONE IN ALMOST EVERY PRE-SEASON POLL. THAT GOES FOR THE WOMEN’S TEAM AS WELL. DID YOU KNOW?THE NASHER MUSEUM OF ART IS NOW OPEN ON THE DUKE CAMPUS. FEW THINGS IN LIFE START OFF AS “WORLD CLASS” BUT THIS IS ONE OF THEM. WITH A CAFÉ INSIDE, YOU CAN SPEND THE DAY OBSERVING WORKS BY PICASSO AND OTHER FAMOUS CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS. |
BACK
IN THE SUMMER I WAS LISTENING TO THE RADIO IN MY CAR WHEN THE NEWS CAST
OPENED WITH A STARTLING ANNOUNCEMENT. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
HAD JUST HANDED DOWN A 5 TO 4 DECISION EFFECTIVELY SAYING THE STATE AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAD THE RIGHT TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY BY EMINENT
DOMAIN FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONVERTING IT TO “PROFIT MAKING PRIVATE RE
DEVELOPMENT”. IN THE PAST THE
NEED FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO SEIZE PRIVATE PROPERTY HAS BEEN LIMITED TO
USES LIKE HIGHWAYS, SCHOOLS, AND PARKS. WOW!! MY FIRST REACTION WAS
THAT BIG BUSINESS HAS PULLED OFF A DOOZY THIS TIME. THEN THE NEWSCAST
WENT ON TO EXPLAIN THAT THE JUSTICES THAT SUPPORTED THIS RULING WERE THE
ONES WE COMMONLY REFER TO AS “LEFT OR LIBERAL” JUSTICES. NOW, STOP RIGHT HERE AND PUT YOUR POLITICS ASIDE, BECAUSE I HAVE YET TO TALK TO ANY OF MY “LIBERAL” OR “CONSERVATIVE” FRIENDS THAT THINKS THAT THIS DECISION IS A GOOD IDEA. THE CASE IN POINT ENVOLVED A RUN DOWN SECTION OF NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT WHICH THE TOWN LEADERS HAD DESIGNATED FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT. ALONG CAME A BIG COMPANY WILLING TO SPRING FOR A LARGE COMMERCIAL VENTURE THAT WOULD GREATLY INCREASE THE TAX BASE OF THE COMMUNITY. BECAUSE SOME OF ITS CITIZENS REFUSED TO SELL, THE TOWN COUNCIL USED EMINENT DOMAIN TO CONDEMN THE PROPERTY. WHAT THE COURT SAID IS THAT TAKING PRIVATE LAND AND CONVERTING IT TO A HIGHER TAX BASE FITS THEIR DEFINITION OF “THE PUBLIC GOOD”. NOW, IF YOU JUST SAID TO YOURSELF THAT THE WHOLE TOWN BENEFITED, THEREFORE IT WAS “OK”, WHAT WOULD YOU THINK IF IT HAD BEEN YOUR PROPERTY? WE ALL LIVE UNDER THE THREAT OF THE FREEWAY COMING THROUGH OUR HOUSE (OR EVEN WORSE, OUR NEIGHBOR’S HOUSE), BUT THOSE LINES HAVE BEEN WELL-DEFINED FOR DECADES. EXPANDING EMINENT DOMAIN TO INCLUDE THE TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL USE JUST TO FATTEN THE TAX COFFERS GOES AGAINST ONE OF THE FOUNDING PRINCIPLES OF THE COUNTRY---PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS. ONE OF THE BASIC COVENANTS FOR A REALTOR IS TO PROTECT YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS. WHEN YOU BUY YOUR HOUSE OR SECOND HOME OR INVESTMENT PROPERTY, YOU WANT TO BE CERTAIN THAT YOU CONTROL ITS FUTURE, NOT THE GOVERNMENT. THE POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE OF THIS TYPE OF USE OF “EMINENT DOMAIN” STAGGERS THE MIND. NONE OF US WOULD BE SAFE FROM SOME INVESTOR’S GREEDY OUTREACHING HAND.WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT? WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THE SUPREME COURT, YOU SAY? NOT EXACTLY!! THE TONE FOR APPOINTMENTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT IS SET AT THE GRASS ROOTS LEVEL. IF PRESERVING YOUR RIGHT TO CONTROL THE FUTURE OF THE INVESTMENT YOU MADE IN YOUR PROPERTY IS IMPORTANT TO YOU, THEN MAKE YOURSELF HEARD. |
|
|||||||||